2 Dems Rescue Republicans in Move That Leaves Jeffries Humiliated
Two moderate House Democrats broke with their party Tuesday and helped Republicans pass a narrowly divided procedural vote during Congress’ final stretch before the November midterm elections.
Reps. Jared Golden of Maine and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington sided with Republicans on the rule governing consideration of several measures, including a major Russia sanctions bill.
The rule passed 214-211, with Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez providing the only Democratic votes in favor.
Two Republicans opposed the rule, meaning the Democratic defections were decisive in allowing the package to move forward.
Procedural rule votes are typically treated as tests of party unity because the minority party generally votes against rules written by the majority.
Golden’s office said his decision was driven by his support for legislation targeting Russia over its war in Ukraine.
His spokesman said Golden did not want the sanctions bill to die on a procedural vote after it had already received overwhelming bipartisan support in the Senate.
Gluesenkamp Perez offered a similar explanation and pointed to the large Ukrainian community she represents in southwestern Washington.
“I’ll always stand with my community’s values,” she wrote while saying the vote moved Congress closer to enacting additional sanctions on Russia.
She said she planned to support the underlying legislation when it reached a final House vote.
The sanctions measure passed the Senate 86-11 and would expand economic pressure on Russia while also giving President Donald Trump additional tariff authority against countries purchasing Russian energy.
The legislation also targets Russian energy and defense interests, sanctions-evasion networks and Iran.
Some House Democrats support stronger sanctions on Moscow but have raised concerns about provisions granting Trump broader discretion over tariffs and waivers.
Those disagreements helped turn what might otherwise have been a broadly bipartisan foreign-policy measure into a more complicated procedural fight.
The vote also revived tensions between Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez and House Democratic leadership.
Both lawmakers broke with their caucus on another rule vote earlier this month, prompting an unusually sharp response from Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other Democratic leaders.
At the time, Democratic leaders called the move a “significant breach of trust” and said the caucus’ rules committee would review the matter.
No publicly announced punishment had followed before Tuesday’s second defection.
Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez have both cultivated reputations as members willing to separate from Democratic leadership on selected votes.
Golden is retiring from Congress at the end of his current term, reducing the political consequences he personally faces from another intraparty dispute.
Gluesenkamp Perez is seeking reelection in a Washington district that supported Trump in 2024, making her voting record a major feature of her campaign.
Tuesday’s vote does not itself enact the Russia sanctions legislation.
Instead, the rule establishes the procedures allowing the House to debate and vote on that bill and several other measures.
The sanctions legislation is expected to receive a separate final vote as lawmakers attempt to complete business before leaving Washington ahead of the midterms.
For Jeffries, the episode provided another example of two members refusing to follow Democratic leadership on a procedural vote, Fox News reported.
For Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez, the explanation was equally direct: they believed advancing the Russia sanctions bill mattered more than maintaining party unity on the rule.
💥 PRESS DEBUT DISASTER!
Katie Zacharia’s Awkward First White House Press Briefing Draws National Attention
Katie Zacharia’s first appearance behind the White House podium quickly became a major talking point after several uncomfortable moments overshadowed her debut as President Donald Trump’s new press secretary.
The October 13 briefing lasted approximately 14 minutes, with Zacharia answering questions from only three news outlets before ending the session. Her short appearance immediately attracted widespread media attention.
Zacharia had recently been selected to replace former press secretary Karoline Leavitt, stepping into a highly visible role responsible for communicating the administration’s positions to journalists and the American public.
From the opening minutes, observers noticed her reliance on prepared notes. She delivered a lengthy account of Trump’s accomplishments, frequently looking down at the script instead of maintaining eye contact with reporters.
Her delivery also attracted criticism, with commentators describing her voice as hesitant and her presentation as unusually stiff. Others questioned whether the administration had given its newest spokesperson enough preparation time.
Much of the briefing focused on praising Trump’s economic agenda, energy policies, rally attendance, and political achievements. The extended list of talking points left relatively little time for substantive exchanges with journalists.
One particularly awkward moment occurred when Zacharia discussed the challenge of balancing her demanding position with family life. She explained that spending evenings away from her four children was unacceptable to her.
She then accidentally referred to her husband as “my president” before immediately correcting herself with “my husband.” Recognizing the slip, she added a brief joke, creating the briefing’s most widely discussed moment.
The verbal mix-up spread rapidly through news coverage and social media, becoming a defining image of her first appearance. Critics treated it as evidence of nervousness, while others viewed it as an ordinary human mistake.
Her response to a question about U.S. intelligence sharing with Ukraine also drew attention. When asked whether Washington had stopped sharing intelligence with Kyiv, Zacharia replied that she would have to get back to the reporter.
The exchange was brief, but it highlighted the difficulty of responding to sensitive foreign policy questions without immediately having the necessary information. Reporters continued seeking answers as the briefing moved forward.
Another significant announcement concerned Kimberly Guilfoyle, the U.S. ambassador to Greece. Zacharia told reporters that the administration had asked Guilfoyle to resign, unexpectedly introducing a personnel development into the short briefing.
The announcement generated additional headlines and demonstrated that, despite the awkward delivery, Zacharia’s first appearance included consequential political news. Her handling of the announcement, however, also attracted scrutiny from commentators.
Questions about her readiness soon emerged among political observers and some administration allies. The Wall Street Journal described the debut as rocky, reporting that her nervous presentation prompted questions about the decision to put her before cameras so quickly.
The brief question-and-answer session was another unusual feature. After taking questions from Breitbart News, Fox News, and the Daily Mail, Zacharia announced that reporters could ask Trump questions directly as he prepared to leave.
Her decision to end the briefing after such limited questioning became another focus of criticism. Regular White House briefings often involve extended exchanges, making the short session particularly noticeable to journalists and political commentators.
Despite the criticism, Trump publicly defended his new press secretary. Asked about her performance, the president said he thought she had done very well, offering a clear show of support following the difficult debut.
The White House also presented the briefing positively, describing Zacharia’s performance as commanding. That assessment contrasted with critical media coverage, illustrating how differently supporters and detractors interpreted the same appearance.
Zacharia’s debut has therefore become an early test of her ability to manage a demanding communications role. Future briefings will offer a clearer indication of whether she can develop greater confidence and handle sustained questioning.
For now, the accidental “my president” remark remains the most memorable moment from her first appearance. Whether the incident becomes a brief viral embarrassment or a lasting political talking point will depend on what follows.
