Anti-ICE Rioter Caught Hurling Rocks at Agents Learns Fate
A California man captured on video throwing large rocks at federal immigration officers during last year’s unrest in the Los Angeles area has been sentenced to three years in federal prison.
Elpidio Reyna, 42, of Compton, received a 36-month sentence Friday after previously pleading guilty to assaulting a federal officer with a deadly or dangerous weapon and causing bodily injury.
U.S. District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha imposed the sentence. Reyna has been in federal custody since July 2025.
The case stems from June 7, 2025, when federal officers were staging an immigration-enforcement operation near a Home Depot in Paramount, California.
Protests had formed in the area in response to federal immigration operations, and portions of the demonstration later turned violent.
According to Reyna’s plea agreement, he intentionally threw rocks at a convoy of U.S. Customs and Border Protection vehicles as officers drove through the area.
One of the rocks struck a government vehicle, shattering glass and cutting a federal officer on the forehead.
Prosecutors also said Reyna lit objects on fire in the street during the disturbance.
Video footage from the scene showed a man wearing a motorcycle helmet standing near the roadway and hurling large objects at passing federal vehicles.
Reyna pleaded guilty in February to one felony count of assault on a federal officer by use of a deadly or dangerous weapon resulting in bodily injury.
The charge carried a potential sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison.
Federal prosecutors argued that the violence went far beyond lawful protest.
“Disagreeing with laws passed by Congress does not give you a right to assault federal officers,” said First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli.
“This defendant thought he would go unpunished for throwing large rocks at law enforcement. Instead, he’ll be serving time in federal prison, where he can reflect on his poor decision,” he added.
Prosecutors also rejected Reyna’s explanation that his actions were “sudden and emotional and fueled by alcohol” and anger over U.S. immigration policy.
They argued that frustration with government policy did not excuse attacking law-enforcement officers.
The Paramount unrest was part of a broader wave of demonstrations that erupted around Los Angeles County in June 2025 after federal authorities stepped up immigration-enforcement operations.
Many demonstrations remained peaceful, but federal prosecutors brought criminal cases against individuals accused of throwing rocks, fireworks, incendiary devices and other objects at law-enforcement officers.
In downtown Los Angeles the following day, protesters also clashed with California Highway Patrol officers near the 101 Freeway, where vehicles were damaged and one patrol vehicle was set on fire.
Federal authorities have since obtained several guilty pleas and prison sentences connected to violence during those demonstrations.
In one separate case, a Westlake man was sentenced in July to 37 months in prison after pleading guilty to throwing rocks and burning debris at CHP officers during the downtown Los Angeles unrest.
Reyna’s case, however, involved a direct assault on federal immigration personnel during the earlier Paramount confrontation.
The FBI, Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Border Patrol investigated the case.
His three-year sentence closes one of the more prominent prosecutions arising from the 2025 anti-immigration-enforcement protests, largely because video of the rock-throwing circulated widely at the time.
The Justice Department has emphasized throughout the prosecutions that peaceful protest is constitutionally protected, while violence against officers and property is subject to criminal penalties.
Reyna’s conviction and sentence reflect that distinction: he was prosecuted not for participating in an anti-ICE demonstration, but for intentionally attacking federal officers and injuring one of them with a thrown rock.
💥 PRESS DEBUT DISASTER!
Katie Zacharia’s Awkward First White House Press Briefing Draws National Attention
Katie Zacharia’s first appearance behind the White House podium quickly became a major talking point after several uncomfortable moments overshadowed her debut as President Donald Trump’s new press secretary.
The October 13 briefing lasted approximately 14 minutes, with Zacharia answering questions from only three news outlets before ending the session. Her short appearance immediately attracted widespread media attention.
Zacharia had recently been selected to replace former press secretary Karoline Leavitt, stepping into a highly visible role responsible for communicating the administration’s positions to journalists and the American public.
From the opening minutes, observers noticed her reliance on prepared notes. She delivered a lengthy account of Trump’s accomplishments, frequently looking down at the script instead of maintaining eye contact with reporters.
Her delivery also attracted criticism, with commentators describing her voice as hesitant and her presentation as unusually stiff. Others questioned whether the administration had given its newest spokesperson enough preparation time.
Much of the briefing focused on praising Trump’s economic agenda, energy policies, rally attendance, and political achievements. The extended list of talking points left relatively little time for substantive exchanges with journalists.
One particularly awkward moment occurred when Zacharia discussed the challenge of balancing her demanding position with family life. She explained that spending evenings away from her four children was unacceptable to her.
She then accidentally referred to her husband as “my president” before immediately correcting herself with “my husband.” Recognizing the slip, she added a brief joke, creating the briefing’s most widely discussed moment.
The verbal mix-up spread rapidly through news coverage and social media, becoming a defining image of her first appearance. Critics treated it as evidence of nervousness, while others viewed it as an ordinary human mistake.
Her response to a question about U.S. intelligence sharing with Ukraine also drew attention. When asked whether Washington had stopped sharing intelligence with Kyiv, Zacharia replied that she would have to get back to the reporter.
The exchange was brief, but it highlighted the difficulty of responding to sensitive foreign policy questions without immediately having the necessary information. Reporters continued seeking answers as the briefing moved forward.
Another significant announcement concerned Kimberly Guilfoyle, the U.S. ambassador to Greece. Zacharia told reporters that the administration had asked Guilfoyle to resign, unexpectedly introducing a personnel development into the short briefing.
The announcement generated additional headlines and demonstrated that, despite the awkward delivery, Zacharia’s first appearance included consequential political news. Her handling of the announcement, however, also attracted scrutiny from commentators.
Questions about her readiness soon emerged among political observers and some administration allies. The Wall Street Journal described the debut as rocky, reporting that her nervous presentation prompted questions about the decision to put her before cameras so quickly.
The brief question-and-answer session was another unusual feature. After taking questions from Breitbart News, Fox News, and the Daily Mail, Zacharia announced that reporters could ask Trump questions directly as he prepared to leave.
Her decision to end the briefing after such limited questioning became another focus of criticism. Regular White House briefings often involve extended exchanges, making the short session particularly noticeable to journalists and political commentators.
Despite the criticism, Trump publicly defended his new press secretary. Asked about her performance, the president said he thought she had done very well, offering a clear show of support following the difficult debut.
The White House also presented the briefing positively, describing Zacharia’s performance as commanding. That assessment contrasted with critical media coverage, illustrating how differently supporters and detractors interpreted the same appearance.
Zacharia’s debut has therefore become an early test of her ability to manage a demanding communications role. Future briefings will offer a clearer indication of whether she can develop greater confidence and handle sustained questioning.
For now, the accidental “my president” remark remains the most memorable moment from her first appearance. Whether the incident becomes a brief viral embarrassment or a lasting political talking point will depend on what follows.
