Calif. Sheriff Investigates ‘Massive’ Ballot Discrepancy In Special Election
Riverside County, California, Sheriff Chad Bianco has launched an investigation into a significant discrepancy between machine-counted ballots and handwritten logs from last year’s special election, raising questions about the accuracy of the vote count.
According to county officials, voting machines recorded more than 657,000 ballots cast. However, an independent review conducted by a group of citizens found that handwritten logs maintained by poll workers and election staff reflected just over 611,000 votes, ABC News reported.
The difference of roughly 45,800 ballots prompted Bianco to open a formal investigation. He said the goal is to determine whether the discrepancy is the result of human error or a more serious issue.
“I’m not saying anyone is lying, or there’s a series of mistakes,” Bianco said during a news conference. “I’m saying I don’t know,” he said.
“We’re not talking about ten, we’re not even talking about a thousand,” Bianco added. “We’re talking about the difference between having a perfect count and a 45,800 vote difference. That’s massive,” he said.
As part of the investigation, sheriff’s deputies recently executed search warrants at the Riverside County Registrar of Voters office, seizing multiple boxes of ballots from the 2025 special election. Bianco said a superior court judge has authorized the appointment of a special master to oversee the review process. The ballots will be recounted under that supervision.
“The purpose of this investigation is just as much to prove the election is accurate as it is to show otherwise,” Bianco, a Republican who is running for California governor, said. “We will not know until the count is complete.”
Riverside County Registrar of Voters Art Tinoco has defended the official machine count, suggesting the discrepancy may stem from errors in handwritten documentation rather than issues with the ballots themselves.
“Those documents are completed by temporary employees that are out in the field collecting them, and working at these sites,” Tinoco said at a recent Board of Supervisors meeting. “So those forms, again, may come back and the counts may be imprecise, because again, it’s humans completing the document,” he said.
They told you the counts are verified. The systems are secure. The people demanding answers are the threat.
Riverside County logged 611,428 ballots cast.
Certified count: 657,322.
45,896 votes. No matching ballots. Public record.
Sheriff Bianco pulled the logs. Got the… pic.twitter.com/iKZM6TF0OG
— Jake (@JakeCan72) March 21, 2026
The investigation has drawn sharp criticism from California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, who questioned both its scope and its basis.
“I was surprised and disappointed by Sheriff Bianco’s statements in his press conference,” Bonta said. “Sheriff Bianco’s investigation is unprecedented in both scope and scale — and appears not to be based on facts or evidence but on unfounded allegations that have already been refuted by the Riverside Registrar of Voters,” he said.
Bonta also said his office was concerned after learning that the sheriff planned to seize ballot materials related to the election. He said those concerns were communicated to Bianco in letters sent over the past month.
Bianco confirmed receiving the letters and said he was troubled by what he described as resistance to the investigation.
“The outrage that an investigation was happening was extremely concerning to me,” Bianco said.
The probe remains ongoing as officials prepare to conduct a full review of the ballots under court supervision. Authorities have not announced a timeline for when the recount or investigation will be completed.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.
💥 PRESS DEBUT DISASTER!
Katie Zacharia’s Awkward First White House Press Briefing Draws National Attention
Katie Zacharia’s first appearance behind the White House podium quickly became a major talking point after several uncomfortable moments overshadowed her debut as President Donald Trump’s new press secretary.
The October 13 briefing lasted approximately 14 minutes, with Zacharia answering questions from only three news outlets before ending the session. Her short appearance immediately attracted widespread media attention.
Zacharia had recently been selected to replace former press secretary Karoline Leavitt, stepping into a highly visible role responsible for communicating the administration’s positions to journalists and the American public.
From the opening minutes, observers noticed her reliance on prepared notes. She delivered a lengthy account of Trump’s accomplishments, frequently looking down at the script instead of maintaining eye contact with reporters.
Her delivery also attracted criticism, with commentators describing her voice as hesitant and her presentation as unusually stiff. Others questioned whether the administration had given its newest spokesperson enough preparation time.
Much of the briefing focused on praising Trump’s economic agenda, energy policies, rally attendance, and political achievements. The extended list of talking points left relatively little time for substantive exchanges with journalists.
One particularly awkward moment occurred when Zacharia discussed the challenge of balancing her demanding position with family life. She explained that spending evenings away from her four children was unacceptable to her.
She then accidentally referred to her husband as “my president” before immediately correcting herself with “my husband.” Recognizing the slip, she added a brief joke, creating the briefing’s most widely discussed moment.
The verbal mix-up spread rapidly through news coverage and social media, becoming a defining image of her first appearance. Critics treated it as evidence of nervousness, while others viewed it as an ordinary human mistake.
Her response to a question about U.S. intelligence sharing with Ukraine also drew attention. When asked whether Washington had stopped sharing intelligence with Kyiv, Zacharia replied that she would have to get back to the reporter.
The exchange was brief, but it highlighted the difficulty of responding to sensitive foreign policy questions without immediately having the necessary information. Reporters continued seeking answers as the briefing moved forward.
Another significant announcement concerned Kimberly Guilfoyle, the U.S. ambassador to Greece. Zacharia told reporters that the administration had asked Guilfoyle to resign, unexpectedly introducing a personnel development into the short briefing.
The announcement generated additional headlines and demonstrated that, despite the awkward delivery, Zacharia’s first appearance included consequential political news. Her handling of the announcement, however, also attracted scrutiny from commentators.
Questions about her readiness soon emerged among political observers and some administration allies. The Wall Street Journal described the debut as rocky, reporting that her nervous presentation prompted questions about the decision to put her before cameras so quickly.
The brief question-and-answer session was another unusual feature. After taking questions from Breitbart News, Fox News, and the Daily Mail, Zacharia announced that reporters could ask Trump questions directly as he prepared to leave.
Her decision to end the briefing after such limited questioning became another focus of criticism. Regular White House briefings often involve extended exchanges, making the short session particularly noticeable to journalists and political commentators.
Despite the criticism, Trump publicly defended his new press secretary. Asked about her performance, the president said he thought she had done very well, offering a clear show of support following the difficult debut.
The White House also presented the briefing positively, describing Zacharia’s performance as commanding. That assessment contrasted with critical media coverage, illustrating how differently supporters and detractors interpreted the same appearance.
Zacharia’s debut has therefore become an early test of her ability to manage a demanding communications role. Future briefings will offer a clearer indication of whether she can develop greater confidence and handle sustained questioning.
For now, the accidental “my president” remark remains the most memorable moment from her first appearance. Whether the incident becomes a brief viral embarrassment or a lasting political talking point will depend on what follows.
