I'm Not Letting You Get Away With This!' - Bongino Just Called Out Obama
Former FBI Co-Deputy Director Dan Bongino sharply responded to recent comments made by former President Barack Obama regarding the proper role of the Department of Justice and concerns over the politicization of law enforcement. Obama made the remarks during an appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, where he warned against using government power to target political opponents and emphasized that the attorney general should function as “the people’s lawyer” rather than serving at the direct direction of the White House on specific prosecutions.
Bongino addressed Obama’s statements on his podcast, stating, “I know things too, Mr. President, and so do you,” and adding, “And I’m not letting you get away with this, no chance!” The remarks were widely interpreted as a pointed warning and a reference to Bongino’s long-standing claims about the origins and conduct of investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, often referred to as “Russiagate.”
Bongino, who served in the Secret Service Presidential Protective Division during Obama’s presidency, has become a prominent conservative commentator and critic of the former administration. He has repeatedly asserted that certain documents and information he encountered during his time at the FBI support allegations of government overreach and weaponization of institutions against political opponents. His recent comments come amid heightened national debate over prosecutorial independence, executive authority, and the legacy of investigations from the 2016 cycle.
Bongino’s tenure as FBI Co-Deputy Director from March 2025 to January 2026 was marked by both praise for advancing certain priorities and criticism over internal management disputes. He resigned from the position in early 2026, citing a desire to return to family life and his media career. President Donald Trump publicly praised Bongino’s contributions and suggested he could have greater impact through his public platform.
The exchange between Bongino and Obama reflects persistent partisan divisions over accountability, the proper boundaries of federal law enforcement, and interpretations of events surrounding the 2016 election. Obama’s remarks emphasized the importance of institutional independence to maintain public trust in the justice system. Bongino, by contrast, framed his response as a defense against what he views as selective narratives that downplay alleged misconduct during the Obama-era investigations.
The public back-and-forth has drawn attention from both conservative and liberal commentators, with some viewing Bongino’s statement as a challenge for further disclosure of information and others seeing it as continuation of long-running political grievances. No new documents or formal investigations were referenced in the immediate exchange.
Broader context includes ongoing discussions about executive influence over federal agencies, the role of special counsels, and the balance between national security imperatives and civil liberties. Bongino has previously expressed concerns about his personal safety should Democrats regain significant power in Congress, adding a personal dimension to his public commentary.
The episode underscores how debates from the 2016 election period continue to influence contemporary political discourse more than a decade later. Whether Bongino’s remarks lead to additional public disclosures or remain rhetorical remains to be seen. For now, the exchange serves as a reminder of the deep and enduring partisan fault lines surrounding issues of government power, accountability, and institutional trust.
A powerful district attorney came to my house before dawn with a baseball bat and a sheriff carrying a fake warrant.
Daniel Brooks stepped through my broken doorway like a man who believed the law belonged to him.
Rain dripped from his suit.
A baseball bat hung from his right hand.
Behind him stood Sheriff Walker, broad shoulders filling the doorway, one palm resting near his belt as if intimidation were part of his uniform.
“Give me my son,” Daniel said.
Ethan shook so hard in my arms the blanket slipped from one shoulder.
I pulled it back around him and held him tighter against my cardigan.
His face was bruised.
One eye swollen.
Mud dried along his jaw where he had fallen running through the woods behind my house.
When Daniel’s voice hit the room, Ethan buried his face against me.
“Grandma,” he whispered. “Don’t let him take me.”
I felt the old part of myself wake fully.
Not the grandmother.
Not the widow.
The colonel.
The woman who had once sat in windowless rooms listening to men lie while entire operations depended on noticing which finger twitched first.
Daniel raised the bat slightly.
Sheriff Walker glanced at Ethan’s face.
For the first time, his confidence flickered.
Good.
He had not expected the boy to look that damaged under lamplight.
I kept my voice quiet.
“A warrant at three-thirty in the morning. You boys got sloppy.”
Daniel froze mid-step.
Sheriff Walker’s eyes moved to my covered hand beneath the knitting blanket.
A faint metallic click cut through the rain and police lights.
Daniel heard it.
His rage drained by a fraction.
“Evelyn,” he said, forcing calm. “You’re confused. Ethan ran away. I’m here to bring him home.”
Ethan made a small broken sound.
I looked at Daniel.
“No. You’re here because he saw the rug.”
Daniel’s mouth tightened.
Sheriff Walker stopped breathing for half a second.
That was enough.
I rose halfway from my chair with Ethan still tucked against one side of me.
My hidden hand stayed beneath the blanket.
“Come closer, Daniel.”
He did not.
For the first time since entering my house, the district attorney understood he was not standing in front of an old woman.
He was standing inside a trap he had helped build with his own arrogance.
