wire
Sep 07, 2026

TRUMP & CHARLES INVOLVED IN NEW DRAMA AFTER REPORT THE KING IS ‘SICKENED’ BY INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRESIDENT

The relationship between President Donald Trump and King Charles III has entered a new round of scrutiny after a report claimed the British monarch was deeply uncomfortable over newly surfaced information suggesting the two men are distant relatives.

The report has added another layer to a relationship that has largely appeared cordial in public. Trump has repeatedly spoken warmly about Charles, while the King has maintained a diplomatic posture toward the American president despite reports suggesting the two do not share the same political outlook.

The latest controversy also comes after Trump shared an edited video that appeared to portray Charles as dismissive toward a man who collapsed during a royal visit. Full footage from the 2020 incident, however, showed a significantly different sequence of events.

An Edited Video Brings Trump and Charles Back Into the Spotlight

The video Trump shared was presented as a contrast between world leaders supposedly disrespecting members of the public and Trump interacting warmly with veterans, police officers and other Americans.

One portion showed Charles, then the Prince of Wales, appearing to walk away after a man fell during a royal engagement in July 2020.

But the complete footage showed Charles reaching toward the man before remaining nearby while he received medical attention.

The distinction is important because the edited clip created an impression that was not supported by the full video.

Buckingham Palace indicated that it would not comment on the matter.

The video also included captions portraying Trump as “the people’s president” and suggesting that viewers were being shown “the side of Trump the media doesn’t show you.” The presentation further emphasized the political nature of the clip rather than simply documenting what happened during the royal visit.

That episode brought renewed attention to the public relationship between Trump and Charles—and to the question of how much of their cordial image reflects genuine personal warmth.

Trump Has Publicly Praised Charles

Whatever differences may exist privately, Trump has spoken positively about Charles in public.

At the conclusion of Charles and Queen Camilla’s state visit to the United States in April, Trump described Charles as “the greatest king in my book.”

Charles, meanwhile, has generally avoided public criticism of Trump and has maintained the diplomatic tone expected of a reigning British monarch.

That does not necessarily mean the two men share the same political views.

Earlier reports cited by the source suggested Charles would prefer the relationship to remain relatively casual. That claim stands in contrast to another report portraying Charles as someone who actually enjoys Trump's personality, even while the two supposedly disagree on many issues.

The result is a relationship that can look very different depending on whether it is viewed through the lens of diplomacy or personality.

Report Claims Charles Was ‘Sickened’ by Family Connection

The most provocative claim comes from RadarOnline, which reported that newly surfaced genealogical research suggested Trump and Charles are distant cousins.

According to the report, both men are descendants of a 16th-century Scottish nobleman.

The alleged family connection itself would not necessarily be unusual. Royal and aristocratic family lines have intersected across Europe and North America for centuries.

What makes the story more dramatic is the claim about Charles' reaction.

A source quoted by RadarOnline said there was “a degree of discomfort” over the discovery and claimed that Charles was “sickened” to learn that he and Trump were related.

The same source alleged that the King strongly dislikes Trump's foreign policy, environmental policy, manners and personality.

Those claims have not been independently established in the material provided for this report. They should therefore be understood as allegations attributed to an unnamed source rather than confirmed statements from the King or Buckingham Palace.

The distinction matters, particularly when the allegation concerns the private feelings of a member of the British royal family.

Another Report Offers a Very Different Picture

Adding to the uncertainty is a separate report from entertainment journalist Rob Shuter, which presented a considerably warmer assessment of the relationship.

According to that report, Charles enjoys Trump's company even though the two men supposedly agree on very little politically.

One source characterized Trump as sharp, unpredictable and capable of commanding a room—qualities the source said Charles appreciates.

The comparison was made with Joan Rivers, who had been a friend of Charles.

Another insider offered a similar explanation, saying that Charles values people who are interesting and entertaining rather than people who necessarily agree with him.

If accurate, that portrayal suggests that Charles' relationship with Trump could be more complicated than a simple political disagreement.

The two men may disagree over policy while still finding something personally engaging in one another.

Diplomacy Makes the Relationship Harder to Read

Public interactions between presidents and monarchs are rarely a straightforward reflection of private relationships.

Charles, as Britain's head of state, has a constitutional role that requires him to maintain diplomatic relations with the elected government of the United States regardless of personal political preferences.

Trump, meanwhile, has shown that he places considerable value on personal relationships with prominent foreign leaders.

That makes their public exchanges significant even when their private views remain unknown.

The conflicting reports also illustrate why claims about the King's personal feelings should be treated cautiously. One account depicts Charles as deeply uncomfortable with the idea of being related to Trump. Another portrays him as enjoying Trump's unpredictable personality.

Those accounts do not necessarily prove that one side is true and the other false. They demonstrate that the private relationship between the two men remains difficult to establish from anonymous-source reporting alone.

What Happens Next?

For now, there is no indication in the supplied material that the reported family connection has changed the formal relationship between Trump and Charles.

Nor has Buckingham Palace publicly confirmed the more dramatic claims about the King's alleged feelings toward the president.

The clearest picture remains the one visible in public: Trump and Charles have maintained a cordial diplomatic relationship, Trump has praised the King, and Charles has continued to interact with the American president in an official capacity.

May you like

Behind that public image, however, competing reports continue to raise questions about what the two men actually think of each other.

Until either side addresses those private claims directly, the story remains a matter of conflicting reports rather than an established royal feud.

Other posts