TRUMP SAYS U.S. WILL WIN IRAN WAR “VERY SOON” — BUT REJECTS IRAN’S HORMUZ PROPOSAL
President Donald Trump said Monday that the United States would win its ongoing war with Iran “very soon,” while acknowledging that American officials remain in contact with mediators seeking an end to the conflict.
Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump expressed confidence that the conflict would conclude quickly, saying the United States would prevail “one way or the other” as diplomatic efforts continued behind the scenes.
Trump’s comments came only days after he rejected an Iranian proposal offering to reopen the strategically important Strait of Hormuz within seven days while restarting negotiations over the conflict.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had presented the proposal through mediators, outlining conditions that included lifting the U.S. naval blockade, easing oil sanctions and observing a broader ceasefire.
Under Iran’s proposed timetable, initial steps would take several days, with the Strait of Hormuz reopening around the sixth day and negotiations on a broader agreement beginning afterward.
The proposal was delivered through diplomatic channels involving Qatar and was described by Iranian officials as an accelerated version of an earlier agreement that had subsequently collapsed.
Trump rejected the proposal publicly, saying he did not consider Tehran’s offer acceptable. His administration has instead emphasized broader issues involving Iran’s nuclear program and regional security.
The Strait of Hormuz has become a central issue in the conflict because it is a crucial maritime route for global energy shipments, making its disruption consequential for international markets.
The prolonged disruption has also contributed to pressure on oil markets, with crude prices rising after Trump rejected Tehran’s proposal to reopen the waterway.
Despite rejecting the initial proposal, Trump has indicated that diplomatic contacts have not completely stopped, telling reporters that American officials have been communicating with mediators involved in the negotiations.
Reuters reported that U.S. and Iranian representatives were expected to communicate separately through intermediaries, with discussions focusing on a possible amended version of Tehran’s latest proposal.
Qatar has played an important role in those diplomatic efforts, carrying messages between Washington and Tehran as negotiators attempt to narrow disagreements over the conditions for ending hostilities.
Iranian officials have continued pushing for a diplomatic solution, while maintaining that reopening the Strait depends on conditions including an end to hostilities and changes to the U.S. blockade.
The Trump administration, meanwhile, has placed greater emphasis on securing concessions from Iran, particularly concerning its nuclear program, rather than accepting Tehran’s proposed sequence for reopening the waterway.
The disagreement has created a complicated diplomatic picture: Washington says talks remain possible, while Tehran continues seeking conditions that would allow the Strait of Hormuz to reopen.
Trump also linked the eventual end of the conflict to energy costs, saying during his Oval Office remarks that gasoline prices would fall significantly after the war concludes.
The comments arrive as the conflict continues affecting shipping, energy markets and governments across the Middle East, with mediators attempting to prevent further escalation while keeping diplomatic channels open.
The Associated Press reported that regional and U.S. officials continue working toward a possible agreement, although significant differences remain between Washington and Tehran over the terms of any settlement.
For now, Trump’s declaration of an imminent American victory contrasts with the continuing diplomatic activity surrounding the conflict, suggesting that military pressure and negotiations remain intertwined as both sides seek leverage.
The next stage could depend on whether mediators can produce revised terms acceptable to Washington and Tehran, particularly concerning the Strait of Hormuz, sanctions, nuclear restrictions and the broader ceasefire.
"🔥 POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE! — THE 218-213 VOTE FORCES AOC INTO AN UNTHINKABLE POSITION!"
The Load Forecasting Enhancement Act cleared the House this week as lawmakers approved a broader package of 14 bills dealing with energy reliability, public health, drug enforcement, critical minerals, tourism, and AM radio.
H.R. 9332, sponsored by Republican Rep. Troy Balderson of Ohio and Democratic Rep. Rob Menendez of New Jersey, passed under suspension of the rules by voice vote.
The legislation would require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to create regional joint boards with state public utility commissions to study electric load forecasting and identify practices intended to improve reliability and affordability.
Those boards would examine how utilities predict future electricity demand and develop recommendations aimed at improving the accuracy, oversight, and transparency of those forecasts.
The bill also requires FERC to report the boards’ recommendations to Congress and directs state regulatory authorities to consider incorporating those recommendations into their own forecasting practices.
Supporters argue that more accurate projections could help utilities avoid unnecessary infrastructure spending while preparing the electric grid for growing demand from data centers, manufacturing and other large electricity users.
House Energy and Commerce Committee leaders have increasingly focused on load growth as artificial intelligence infrastructure and other power-intensive industries place new demands on the nation’s electric system.
Energy Subcommittee Chairman Bob Latta said during earlier consideration of the bill that more accurate demand projections could lead to more cost-effective infrastructure development.
The Load Forecasting Enhancement Act was only one component of a much broader legislative push by the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie said the collection of bills was intended to address illicit drugs, grid reliability, domestic supply chains, tourism and access to AM radio.
Among the other measures approved was the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act, which would direct the Department of Transportation to require automakers to include easily accessible AM radio in new vehicles without charging drivers an additional fee.
The House also approved the Combating Illicit Xylazine Act, which would place xylazine into Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act while preserving legitimate veterinary uses.
Another measure, Tyler’s Law, would direct the Department of Health and Human Services to examine whether hospital emergency departments should routinely test overdose patients for fentanyl.
Lawmakers also passed the Stop Pills That Kill Act, aimed at strengthening Drug Enforcement Administration oversight of pill presses and components that can be used to manufacture counterfeit controlled substances.
On energy infrastructure, the High-Capacity Grid Act would require FERC to establish standards for advanced transmission conductors used on certain new or upgraded transmission lines.
The Affordable Innovation for the Grid Act would require the Department of Energy to study how artificial intelligence and high-performance computing could improve the capacity, reliability and efficiency of the bulk power system.
Other legislation focused on recovering critical minerals from contaminated sites and discarded materials as policymakers seek to strengthen domestic supply chains.
The House also approved legislation extending the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act grant program through 2029, with that measure passing in a recorded 343-79 vote.
The American Music Tourism Act would direct federal tourism officials to promote travel to music venues, concerts, sporting attractions and other entertainment destinations across the country.
Another bill would reauthorize federal programs aimed at combating tick-borne and other vector-borne diseases through fiscal year 2030.
Several of the measures passed under the House’s suspension procedure, which is generally used for legislation expected to receive broad support and limits debate while requiring a two-thirds vote when a recorded vote is taken.
H.R. 9332 itself had already demonstrated bipartisan support during committee consideration, advancing from the Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this year without opposition in a 47-0 vote, The House Committee on Energy and Commerce said in a press release.
The House passage moves the Load Forecasting Enhancement Act another step forward as Congress considers how to prepare the electric grid for rapidly changing demand and new technology.
Ilhan Omar Ethics Case Dropped Despite $30M Filing Error
A congressional ethics watchdog recommended dismissing allegations against Rep. Ilhan Omar over financial disclosures that dramatically overstated her household wealth.
The Office of Congressional Conduct voted 5-1 to recommend ending the case, according to a confidential report reviewed Wednesday.
The Minnesota Democrat’s original 2024 disclosure listed household assets ranging between $6 million and $30 million.
That filing drew scrutiny because Omar’s previous disclosures showed dramatically smaller holdings connected mainly to her husband’s businesses.
Omar later amended the report, cutting the couple’s disclosed assets to between $18,004 and $95,000.
Despite that multimillion-dollar discrepancy, OCC investigators found insufficient evidence supporting allegations that Omar filed false or incomplete information.
The report said there was not “substantial reason to believe” Omar violated applicable financial-disclosure requirements.
Omar’s office immediately celebrated the watchdog recommendation as vindication after months of Republican criticism.
“From day one, we have been clear: the Congresswoman is not a millionaire,” her office said.
“This vote clearly underscores that the Congresswoman did nothing wrong,” the statement continued.
Her office also accused “the far right” of trying to “manufacture controversy” surrounding the disclosure mistake.
The disputed valuations centered largely on businesses controlled by Omar’s husband, former political consultant Tim Mynett.
Omar’s 2023 disclosure valued Mynett’s Rose Lake Capital stake between $1 and $1,000.
Her 2024 filing then placed that same Washington-based venture-capital management business between $5 million and $25 million.
The earlier disclosure valued Mynett’s California winery, eStCru LLC, between $15,001 and $50,000.
House Oversight Chairman James Comer demanded financial records from Mynett in February as Republicans intensified scrutiny.
Comer’s committee noted both businesses rose from at most $51,000 to potentially $30 million within one year.
The Kentucky Republican questioned whether undisclosed investors might use Mynett’s companies to seek influence involving a sitting congresswoman.
Comer demanded documents explaining the firms’ finances, investors, ownership interests and dramatic reported valuation increases.
“It’s not possible. It’s not. I’m a money guy. It’s not possible,” Comer said about the increase.
Omar’s office maintained the original valuations resulted from accounting mistakes rather than hidden wealth or misconduct.
Her representatives said the filing used incomplete information and listed business assets without properly accounting for liabilities.
After liabilities were considered, both Mynett companies were listed with no net value on Omar’s amended filing.
The amended disclosure nevertheless reported between $102,502 and $1,005,000 in income from those businesses during 2024.
The winery generated another $2,501 to $5,000, according to the corrected disclosure.
Omar’s lawyer told investigators lawmakers frequently rely on accountants and other professionals when preparing financial disclosures.
The attorney maintained “there is nothing untoward, and nothing illegal has occurred” regarding the mistake.
Omar previously rejected claims she was wealthy, saying she “barely have thousands let alone millions.”
Her newest 2025 disclosure again portrays a dramatically smaller financial picture than the original multimillion-dollar filing suggested.
That report lists household assets between roughly $20,000 and $125,000, alongside student-loan and credit-card debts.
Omar lists between $15,001 and $50,000 in student debt, while Mynett reports similarly ranged credit-card liabilities.
Republicans argue those swings justify continued scrutiny despite the congressional conduct office recommending dismissal of this specific allegation.
It does not erase the original filing, which Omar amended after acknowledging the reported valuations were incorrect.
Nor does the OCC decision resolve separate questions raised by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee.
The Office of Congressional Conduct independently reviews misconduct allegations before potentially referring matters to the House Ethics Committee.
Its board’s 5-1 recommendation asks the House Ethics Committee to dismiss this particular financial-disclosure allegation.
For Omar, the decision provides political ammunition to argue Republican accusations about her finances were exaggerated.
For conservatives, the enormous difference between $30 million and under $100,000 remains difficult to dismiss as insignificant.
Oversight’s inquiry arose amid broader Minnesota social-services fraud investigations, but its letter did not establish Omar’s involvement in fraud.
The watchdog decision represents an important victory for Omar, but it does not make the disclosure discrepancy disappear.
Republicans counter that lawmakers remain responsible for financial forms they certify and that enormous discrepancies deserve transparency.
For now, Omar can claim an ethics victory while Republicans continue demanding answers about the numbers that sparked scrutiny.
